چكيده به لاتين
Iranian Architecture always possesses a rich history whose absence, at present age, is felt more than every other time; and paying attention to its permanence is the necessity of these days' architecture. Former researches emphasize deep crisis of absence of identity in recent architecture, necessity of "durability" in contemporary architecture and revival of Iranian architecture. The purpose of this study, according to the necessity of permanence of Iranian architecture, is the investigation and presentation of solutions of contemporary architecture design based on Iranian architecture. However, conflicts among religions have caused wars, slaughters and discrepancies among nations; so creation of peace and contraction space among their followers is the recent need of communities. Therefore, in order to reach a proper stream for discussion among religions based on Iranian original architecture, solutions with a higher priority from among the aforesaid ones were analyzed in designing Cutural Pardis of Monotheistic Religions. At first step, the research was a case study and its methodology was descriptive-analytic. The research tools were documentary, library-based and field study. In this process, factors and features related to the Iranian architecture during the history were extracted based on the literature. Moreover, designing solutions applied in monument examples of Iranian contemporary architecture with Iranian architecture approach were derived. Simultaneously, with the study of examples of foreign religion centers, designing solutions were extracted; then common factors between the two subjects were identified. In the next step of the study, using survey method, questionnaires distributed among scholars to determine proper factors for designing Cultural Pardis of Monotheistic Religions with Iranian architecture approach. The results of the study showed that for the above purpose, using the factors of "harmony with the surrounding environment and nature", plus "integrity in a complex" and "centrality" plus "innovation in building" were in the first and second priorities, respectively. The following factors were in the lower degree of importance, respectively:
"being geometric", "significant use of light in the inner environment", "application of indicative elements and symbols related to religion and culture", "proportion, symmetry and axialization", "the existence of spirituality and allegories of paradise", "use of common elements between Iranian and foreign monuments" and "roof and arch".
